#Meta psychotic trial#

We analysed results using random-effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.įindings: Twenty-seven reports from 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Our outcomes were the proportion of participants remitting/recovering from psychotic experiences (primary) changes in positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, functioning, distress, or quality of life and economic outcomes (secondary). Methods: We searched thirteen databases for studies concerning psychological interventions for adults with psychotic experiences, but not psychotic disorders. University of Cambridge - Department of Psychiatry More.īackground: Many people with psychotic experiences who seek help do not develop psychotic disorders, yet still demonstrate higher clinical complexity, suboptimal treatment response, and poor clinical and functional outcomes. University of Cambridge - Department of Psychiatry NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust Jesus Perez King's College London - Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) Peter B. University of Sussex - School of Psychology Louise Lafortune University of East Anglia (UEA) Paul French University of Cambridge - Department of Psychiatry Nick Grey University of Cambridge - Department of Psychiatry Clare Knight King's College London - Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience (IoPPN) Julieta Galante University of Cambridge NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research Margaret Heslin University of Cambridge - Department of Psychiatry Jan Stochl University of Cambridge - Department of Psychiatry Debra Russo See all articles by Emma Soneson Emma Soneson

#Meta psychotic trial#

For more information on this collaboration, see the comments published in The Lancet about the trial period, and our decision to make this a permanent offering, or visit The Lancet´s FAQ page, and for any feedback please contact Psychological Interventions for People with Psychotic Experiences: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness and Economic Studies The findings should not be used for clinical or public health decision making and should not be presented to a lay audience without highlighting that they are preliminary and have not been peer-reviewed. These preprints are early stage research papers that have not been peer-reviewed. Preprints available here are not Lancet publications or necessarily under review with a Lancet journal. The usual SSRN checks and a Lancet-specific check for appropriateness and transparency have been applied.

Authors have opted in at submission to The Lancet family of journals to post their preprints on Preprints with The Lancet. Preprints with The Lancet is part of SSRN´s First Look, a place where journals identify content of interest prior to publication.